After a Northview High School teacher and Escambia County School Board member called for the immediate removal of 115 “obscene” books from school libraries until they can be reviewed, the school district has taken a step to control access to the books.
School Superintendent Dr. Smith has implemented a “Restricted Section” in school libraries. The books in question will be housed in the section, and parents will be able to opt-in their students to have access to the restricted book as they are being reviewed.
“While we review disputed books, we want to make sure parents still have the right to make decisions relative to what they believe is and isn’t appropriate for their children,” Smith said. “We feel the implementation of a Restricted Section in each of our school libraries, from which students can access these titles only with parent permission, will best meet the needs of our families as books are under review. The final arbiter of what is appropriate for a child to read is always that child’s parent; not other parents, teachers, or aggrieved members of the public.”
As we first reported on Monday, 30-year veteran teacher Vicki Baggett compiled a growing list of 116 books that she says are inappropriate in schools, mostly due to sexual language and graphic drawings that she believes actually violate Florida’s obscenity laws. To read more about her arguments, click here. To see the list of the books, click here.
Many of the books books on her list contain graphic and descriptive sexual language, include pedophilia and bestiality. One book uses the F-word 116 times. The are numerous books containing underage sex, what she termed “alternate sexualties”, “explicit violent content”, self-mutilation, suicide, rape, racism, and graphic drawings.
School Board Chairman Kevin Adams asked that Smith quarantine or remove from circulation the challenged books until a review consistent with state statute is conducted.
“The School Board has the authority to remove books from its libraries; however, it cannot do so simply because it disagrees with the message of a book or it offends the personal morals of an individual,” School Board General Counsel Ellen Odom said in an emailed statement on Monday. “Through the review process, if the School Board determines that a particular book is pornographic or obscene, is not suited to student needs and their ability to comprehend the material presented, is inappropriate for the grade level and age group for which the material is used, or is factually inaccurate or misleading, it can direct the removal of such book.”
The current school district “Reconsideration of Educational Media Policy” states that requests for reconsideration are to be submitted to the school with the title in question. Once the request has been submitted, the school will form a “School Materials Review Committee” to read the title, review the complaint, consult professional reviews, and consult outside experts as needed. The School Materials Review Committee will then meet to discuss the title and hold a blind vote to keep the title, move the title to another level, or remove the title completely.
The complainant then has the opportunity to appeal the decision to a District Materials Review Committee. That committee will read the title, review the complaint and appeal, consult professional reviews, and consult outside experts as needed. The District Materials Review Committee will then meet to discuss the title and hold a blind vote to keep the title, move the title to another level, or remove the title completely. The complainant then has the opportunity to appeal the decision to the school board.
The Escambia County School Board has scheduled a special workshop for 8 a.m. on October 10 to discuss a revised school library collection development policy and educational media review policy to ensure consistency with a recently passed state law, HB 1467, which requires school districts to be transparent in the selection of instructional materials, including library and reading materials.
14 Responses to “School Superintendent Moves Questioned Library Books To Parental Opt-In ‘Restricted Section’”
HOW DARE HE LET PARENTS DECIDE??!!??
(Just joking, seems perfectly reasonable unless NOT being allowed to read the books were harmful to their children. Also, it gathers in one place books parents fear their children might find interesting.)
Ask all concerned to call Mr. Slayton to have these books removed. He has so far had the interest of his constituents and will stand with us. We don’t need an R rated section in our libraries.
This reminds me of an incident years ago when Northview first opened…I objected the SPORTS ILLUSTRATED SWIMSUIT EDITION being availabe to students..in my mind the testosterone filled high school boys had no reason to be looking at this soft porn in school.The response I got???? we usually keep it in a drawer for the teachers to look at..WELL..okay.. so teachers can look at porn on school time..now that makes a lot of sense..and if it had of been kept in a drawer I would have never seen it…kudos to Mrs.Baggett…speak up… say no to things that our kids do not need to be exposed to….maybe someone needs to contact the governor since our superintendent is unwilling to take a stand against vulgarity in the schools…
I,m so glad we still have decent teachers with morals to protect Our kids from this narrative.Alot of parents Are not Involved in there kids education .Our school board is not always looking after the best interest of children.There after something else for the long term.we need to get parents rights back to vote for a superintendent!! They worded the bill to take away our voice! .
This is a tough one. I don’t want our children to be subjected to those items laid out in Florida Stature 847.012. However, if you read that statute and abide by it, your children will not be able to watch television until they are 18. I know that sounds like a stretch, but who will determine what is and what is not allowed? I would like to see a complete list of the books being segregated (banned) so the citizens can at least understand the thinking. I believe strongly in the first amendment, as all of us should, but once you start banning books you are on the road to burning books.
I support the compromise! Win-win for both sides in my opinion.
This is certainly better than just outright banning the books.
However, any book has the potential to cause offense, and Ms Baggett has shown she is incapable of separating the pornographic from the educational. I don’t trust that she would be able to decide what goes into the restricted section and what doesn’t.
Maybe it would be a better idea to just ban all kids from accessing the library unless they get a signed permission slip from their parents? That way, if you don’t want your kid to read about controversial ideas like “racism is bad” and “LGBT people exist”, you can choose to block their access to books. That would save us from people like Ms Baggett from restricting books for political/personal reasons.
There seems to be a very complex and sophisticated system for the removal of books from the libraries of the school district. There must be a similar complex and sophisticated system for books to enter the libraries of the school district. Can counsel Odom please describe this process? The public would like to know who approved these controversial books? Receipts, please.
I believe this is the right decision for the time being, however, these are high school students who are/almost are adults. Getting mommy or daddy to sign a form so that you can read is ridiculous! Trying to prevent access from certain subjects because you simply don’t agree with the subject matter seems like a violation of the first amendment to me. Perhaps it’s time for Vicki to retire.
This actually seems like a decent enough idea. I don’t want my children to read these books prematurely, however I do recognize that other parents could feel otherwise. There’s still a few issues such as friends going around the restrictions for them, etc.. But as long as there is suitable punishments, like ISS for example, for those who do that I could get behind this idea.
The superintendent is a very weak man. His moral and ethical compass is compromised by his willingness to cower. There is no evidence that exist today that indicates exposing ANYONE to this type of material helps anything. There is however significant evidence that indicates that this material is often associated with abuse, neglect, drug use, domestic violence and other crimes against children and animals. I think I would appoint Ms. Baggett superintendent tomorrow.
A lot of our society is obscene. Moral compass still points North. Not so with so many now days. But, helping young minds move south even more is not acceptable. Why not just turn back to God, and ask Him what He thinks? Not asking other people (even clergy) what they think. I know that does not seem realistic at this point, but that is what needs to happen.
Harmful to minors; guilty of felonies
3(a) Any picture, photograph, drawing, sculpture, motion picture film, videocassette, or similar visual representation or image of a person or portion of the human body which depicts nudity or sexual conduct, sexual excitement, sexual battery, bestiality, or sadomasochistic abuse and which is harmful to minors; or (b) Any book, pamphlet, magazine, printed matter however reproduced, or sound recording that contains any matter defined in s. 847.001, explicit and detailed verbal descriptions or narrative accounts of sexual excitement, or sexual conduct and that is harmful to minors.
(4) A person may not knowingly use a minor in the production of any material described in subsection (3), regardless of whether the material is intended for distribution to minors or is actually distributed to minors.
(5) An adult may not knowingly distribute to a minor on school property, or post on school property, any material described in subsection (3). As used in this subsection, the term “school property” means the grounds or facility of any kindergarten, elementary school, middle school, junior high school, or secondary school, whether public or nonpublic. This subsection does not apply to the distribution or posting of school-approved instructional materials that by design serve as a major tool for assisting in the instruction of a subject or course by school officers, instructional personnel, administrative personnel, school volunteers, educational support employees, or managers as those terms are defined in s. 1012.01.
(6) Any person violating any provision of this section commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
That’s where they belonged to begin with. If a parent has no problem that their kids are reading pornographic trash that’s on them, let them sign for them.
Email Address (will not be published) (required)
Website (enter your own site, if any; not northescambia.com)
Have a comment on this story?
We welcome your comments on this story, but there are some rules to follow::
(1) Be Nice. No comments that slander another, no racism, no sexism, no personal attacks.
(2) No Harrassing Comments. If someone says something bad about you, don't respond. That's childish.
(3) No Libel. That's saying something is not true about someone. Don't do it.
(4) Keep it clean. Nothing vulgar, obscene or sexually related. No profanity or obvious substitutions. Period.
(5) NorthEscambia.com reserves the right to remove any comments that violate our rules or we think to be inappropriate. We are not responsible for what is posted. Comments may not appear right away until they are approved by a moderator.
(6) Limit your comments to the subject in this story only, and limit comments to 300 words or less. Do not post copyrighted material. Comments will not be added to stories that are over 30 days old.
(7) No posts may advertise a commercial business or political group, or link to another commercial web site or political site of any kind.
Written by William Reynolds · Filed Under TOP STORIES
Copyright © 2007-2019 NorthEscambia.com · P.O. Box 1207 · Century, FL 32535 · All Rights Reserved.